Cygnus A: X-rays


Paper

The current version of the paper may be downloaded (either complete or in components), from the table below. I have also updated the referee response letter: see if you like the changes.


X-ray colour images

I have made some (truish) X-ray colour images of Cygnus A, to guide my later analysis. They can be picked up from the links below (either as jpgs, using the original images, or as PostScript files, by clicking on the images). The first few images are direct photon images, with photons coloured according to energy. The last is a colour image made after smoothing.

16_16_16 image
a not very good rendition of the source

16_64_32 image
a colour rendition
that shows the core colour effects, and some changes in colour in the hot-spots.

32_32_32 image
shows hardness
of the core spectrum and some effects in the hot-spots.

4_16_8 image
shows colour variations in diffuse/faint regions
well, but burns out the core and hot-spots.

8_8_8 image
another rendition of the source
that shows the colour variations rather better.

c_800_800_800 image
a colour rendition after smoothing
. The halo around the core arises from the energy-dependent point response function.

The original red, green, and blue images from which these colour images were formed can be found by clicking on the GIFs below. The red image was from data in the energy range 0.50 - 1.25 keV, the green from 1.25 - 2.00 keV, and the blue from 2.00 - 8.00 keV. These bands have about the same number of counts.

0.50 - 1.25 keV image
1.25 - 2.00 keV image
2.00 - 8.00 keV image


Overall X-ray image

An image of the entire source, in the energy band 0.5 - 8.0 keV, is shown below, both with the original Chandra cell size of 0.492 arcsec (which is undersampled), and with a quarter-pixel cell size (of 0.123 arcsec). Cygnus A, 0.5-8.0 keV
Image with 0.492 arcsec pixels
(click to download gzipped FITS file; 39.9 kB).

Cygnus A, 0.5-8.0 keV
Image with 0.123 arcsec pixels
(click to download gzipped FITS file; 132.2 kB).

The FWHM of Chandra is roughly (and I emphasize roughly: the point spread function is not Gaussian) 0.5 arcsec. Since this is quite a bit better than the 0.98 x 0.86 arcsec resolution of the radio data, a convolution by an 0.85 x 0.70 arcsec Gaussian kernel should give a good correspondance of resolutions for direct comparison of the radio and X-ray maps.


Hotspot spectra

After extracting spectra for the hotspots (hotspots A, B, and D are readily identified on the X-ray images), I performed simple spectral fits, where the X-ray emission is modeled as a power-law (synchrotron or inverse-Compton emission) absorbed by the column of gas in our own Galaxy (N_H = 3.057e21 cm-2). The results are represented by the plots below hotspot A spectrum
Hotspot A:
the spectrum is well fitted by a power-law with photon index 1.68 +/- 0.06 and no additional absorbing column. The spectral normalization corresponds to a flux density of 26.2 +/- 1.1 nJy at 1 keV.

hotspot B spectrum
Hotspot B:
the spectrum is well fitted by a power-law with photon index 1.44 +/- 0.12 and no additional absorbing column. The spectral normalization corresponds to a flux density of 5.5 +/- 0.5 nJy at 1 keV. Although this hot-spot has the flattest spectrum, it is also the weakest and the spectral range in the X-ray is the smallest, so the spectral difference is marginal.

hotspot D spectrum
Hotspot D:
the spectrum is well fitted by a power-law with photon index 1.64 +/- 0.05 and no additional absorbing column. The spectral normalization corresponds to a flux density of 35.4 +/- 1.4 nJy at 1 keV. This is the brightest of the hot-spots, and so has the best determined spectrum.

If the hot-spots are generated by inverse-Compton emission, then the radio spectral indices should be 0.68, 0.44, and 0.64 for hotspots A, B, and D respectively in the GHz band.

A synchrotron origin for the hot-spot X-rays is possible if the spectrum is straight from the radio to the X-ray (and the ages of the radiating particles in the X-ray are of order 1 year!). However, this would imply flux densities at 230 GHz for the hotspots of many thousands of Jy. Since this isn't the case, we can safely say that the hot-spot electrons have energy spectra that turn down in the mm/IR range, and then cut off. The X-rays that we see are from the inverse Compton process (see Andy Wilson's Cyg A papers, especially Wilson, A.S., Young, A.J., Shopbell, P.L., 2000; ApJ 544, L27).


Valid HTML 3.2!

Revised 27-Feb-2004 by Mark Birkinshaw